Moorthy I, Easty M, McHugh K, Ridout D, Biassoni L, Gordon I.
Arch Dis Child. 2005 Jul;90(7):733-6.
BACKGROUND: Childhood urinary tract infection (UTI) with or without vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) may predispose to renal scarring. There is no clear consensus in the literature regarding imaging following UTI in infancy. AIMS: To define the role of cystography following a first UTI in children aged under 1 year, when urinary tract ultrasonography (US) is normal. METHODS: Retrospective data collection of 108 children (216 renal units) aged under 1 year at the time of a bacteriologically proven UTI. All had a normal US and underwent both catheter cystogram and DMSA test. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios positive and negative, and diagnostic odds ratio were calculated for VUR on cystography versus scarring on DMSA. RESULTS: VUR was shown in 25 (11.6%) renal units. Scarring on DMSA was seen in 8 (3.7 %) kidneys. Only 16% of kidneys with VUR had associated scarring; 50% of scarred kidneys were not associated with VUR. The likelihood ratio positive was 4.95 (95% CI 2.22 to 11.05) and the likelihood ratio negative was 0.56 (95% CI 0.28 to 1.11). The diagnostic odds ratio was 8.9, suggesting that cystography provided little additional information. CONCLUSION: Since only 16% of children with VUR had an abnormal kidney, the presence of VUR does not identify a susceptible population with an abnormal kidney on DMSA. In the context of a normal ultrasound examination, cystography contributes little to the management of children under the age of 1 year with a UTI. In this context, a normal DMSA study reinforces the redundancy of cystography.
Urinary tract infection: is there a need for routine renal ultrasonography?
BACKGROUND: Childhood urinary tract infection (UTI) with or without vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) may predispose to renal scarring. There is no clear consensus in the literature regarding imaging following UTI in infancy. AIMS: To define the role of cystography following a first UTI in children aged under 1 year, when urinary tract ultrasonography (US) is normal. METHODS: Retrospective data collection of 108 children (216 renal units) aged under 1 year at the time of a bacteriologically proven UTI. All had a normal US and underwent both catheter cystogram and DMSA test. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios positive and negative, and diagnostic odds ratio were calculated for VUR on cystography versus scarring on DMSA. RESULTS: VUR was shown in 25 (11.6%) renal units. Scarring on DMSA was seen in 8 (3.7 %) kidneys. Only 16% of kidneys with VUR had associated scarring; 50% of scarred kidneys were not associated with VUR. The likelihood ratio positive was 4.95 (95% CI 2.22 to 11.05) and the likelihood ratio negative was 0.56 (95% CI 0.28 to 1.11). The diagnostic odds ratio was 8.9, suggesting that cystography provided little additional information. CONCLUSION: Since only 16% of children with VUR had an abnormal kidney, the presence of VUR does not identify a susceptible population with an abnormal kidney on DMSA. In the context of a normal ultrasound examination, cystography contributes little to the management of children under the age of 1 year with a UTI. In this context, a normal DMSA study reinforces the redundancy of cystography.
Urinary tract infection: is there a need for routine renal ultrasonography?
Zamir G, Sakran W, Horowitz Y, Koren A, Miron D.
Arch Dis Child. 2004;89:466-8.
AIMS: To assess the yield of routine renal ultrasound (RUS) in the management of young children hospitalised with first uncomplicated febrile urinary tract infection (UTI). METHODS: All children aged 0-5 years who had been hospitalised over a two year period with first uncomplicated febrile UTI in a medium size institutional regional medical centre were included. Children with known urinary abnormalities and/or who had been treated with antibacterial agents within seven days before admission were excluded. All included children underwent renal ultrasonography during hospitalisation and voiding cystouretrography (VCUG) within 2-6 months. The yield of RUS was measured by its ability to detect renal abnormalities, its sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for detecting vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), and by its impact on UTI management. RESULTS: Of 255 children that were included in the study, 33 children had mild to moderate renal pelvis dilatation on RUS suggesting VUR, of whom only nine had VUR on VCUG. On the other hand, in 36 children with VUR on VCUG the RUS was normal. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of abnormal RUS for detecting VUR were 17.7%, 87.6%, 23.5%, and 83.2% respectively. In none of the patients with abnormal RUS was a change in the management at or following hospitalisation needed. CONCLUSION: Results show that the yield of RUS to the management of children with first uncomplicated UTI is questionable.
AIMS: To assess the yield of routine renal ultrasound (RUS) in the management of young children hospitalised with first uncomplicated febrile urinary tract infection (UTI). METHODS: All children aged 0-5 years who had been hospitalised over a two year period with first uncomplicated febrile UTI in a medium size institutional regional medical centre were included. Children with known urinary abnormalities and/or who had been treated with antibacterial agents within seven days before admission were excluded. All included children underwent renal ultrasonography during hospitalisation and voiding cystouretrography (VCUG) within 2-6 months. The yield of RUS was measured by its ability to detect renal abnormalities, its sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for detecting vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), and by its impact on UTI management. RESULTS: Of 255 children that were included in the study, 33 children had mild to moderate renal pelvis dilatation on RUS suggesting VUR, of whom only nine had VUR on VCUG. On the other hand, in 36 children with VUR on VCUG the RUS was normal. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of abnormal RUS for detecting VUR were 17.7%, 87.6%, 23.5%, and 83.2% respectively. In none of the patients with abnormal RUS was a change in the management at or following hospitalisation needed. CONCLUSION: Results show that the yield of RUS to the management of children with first uncomplicated UTI is questionable.
Commentaires: Ces deux articles bousculent un peu les dogmes en posant la question de la pertinence de l'échographie et de la cystographie après un épisode d'infection urinaire chez le nourrisson. Ils font suite à un article de l'équipe d'Hoberman publié il y plus de deux ans dans le New England Journal of Medicine (voir ci-dessous) et qui concluait que l'échographie n'était pas inispensable ! Dans le premier papier les auteurs ont revu les cystographies (conventionnelle chez les garçons et isotopiques chez les filles) de tout les enfants âgés de 0 à 12 mois ayant eu une première infection urinaire. Sur les 108 nourrissons, 25 reflux était mis en evidence dont un seul de haut grade (l'écho était normale). Les corrélations entre la présence d'un RVU et celle de cicatrices ne sont pas bonnes. Les auteurs rappellent que des études récentes sur le long terme ont montré qu'il n'y avait pas de bonnes corrélations entre la présence de cicatrices et l'apparition d'une HTA. La vraie question reste donc celle de savoir s'il faut une antibioprophylaxie en cas de RVU de bas grade.
Dans le deuxième article qui est plus un commentaire de l'article d'Hoberman, l'analyse prospective de 255 cas (0 à 5 ans) montre qu'il n'y a pas de bonne corrélation entre l'écho et la cystographie en terme de prédiction de la présence d'un RVU. Chez les 14.1% des enfants ayant une écho anormale, l'attitude n'a pas été modifiée par le résultat de cet examen. Les auteurs arrivent aux mêmes conclusions qu'Hoberman: si l'écho anténatale est normale il n'est pas nécessaire de faire une écho après une infection urinaire. Encore faut-il être sur de la qualité de l'échographie anténatale ce qui n'est peut-être pas toujours si évident ...
Imaging studies after a first febrile urinary tract infection in young children.
Hoberman A, Charron M, Hickey RW, Baskin M, Kearney DH, Wald ER.
N Engl J Med. 2003;348:195-202.
N Engl J Med. 2003;348:195-202.
BACKGROUND: Guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend obtaining a voiding cystourethrogram and a renal ultrasonogram for young children after a first urinary tract infection; renal scanning with technetium-99m-labeled dimercaptosuccinic acid has also been endorsed by other authorities. We investigated whether imaging studies altered management or improved outcomes in young children with a first febrile urinary tract infection. METHODS: In a prospective trial involving 309 children (1 to 24 months old), an ultrasonogram and an initial renal scan were obtained within 72 hours after diagnosis, contrast voiding cystourethrography was performed one month later, and renal scanning was repeated six months later. RESULTS: The ultrasonographic results were normal in 88 percent of the children (272 of 309); the identified abnormalities did not modify management. Acute pyelonephritis was diagnosed in 61 percent of the children (190 of 309). Thirty-nine percent of the children who underwent cystourethrography (117 of 302) had vesicoureteral reflux; 96 percent of these children (112 of 117) had grade I, II, or III vesicoureteral reflux. Repeated scans were obtained for 89 percent of the children (275 of 309); renal scarring was noted in 9.5 percent of these children (26 of 275). CONCLUSIONS: An ultrasonogram performed at the time of acute illness is of limited value. A voiding cystourethrogram for the identification of reflux is useful only if antimicrobial prophylaxis is effective in reducing reinfections and renal scarring. Renal scans obtained at presentation identify children with acute pyelonephritis, and scans obtained six months later identify those with renal scarring. The routine performance of urinalysis, urine culture, or both during subsequent febrile illnesses in all children with a previous febrile urinary tract infection will probably obviate the need to obtain either early or late scans. Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire